Monday, 1 November 2010

.net 4 Client Profile on Mono 2.8

If you’re running a .net 4 app built for the .net Client Profile, then you might get the following error when trying to run it on mono:

WARNING: The runtime version supported by this application is unavailable.
Using default runtime: v2.0.50727

To work-around this problem, you can either remove the line

    <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0,Profile=Client"/>



From the app.config file (or yourprogram.exe.config), or add the switch 



--runtime=v4.0.30319



To the mono command-line.

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Troubleshooting Ubuntu Preseed installations

I hit a problem with doing a preseeded Ubuntu installation, where the partitioning wouldn’t continue without a confirmation.

I found lots of discussions about how to work round the problem with the "write the changes to disks and configure lvm" message, but I could have fixed the problems with a lot less trial and error had I known this earlier:

  1. Edit the “append” line of the pxelinux.cfg/default file to include DEBCONF_DEBUG=5
  2. Press Alt-F4 at the point where the automated install hangs to find out what parameter was missing to cause the user prompt.

Friday, 16 July 2010

Connecting Android Phone to 2 Google Accounts (2nd Update)

Previous article here

Well now that T-mobile have pushed out the OTA update for the G2 Touch (HTC Hero), I’ve got Android 2.1 and can connect the phone to 2 Google accounts without a problem.

The only minor problem was that the widget for the Gmail inboxes looked identical and didn’t display unread counts.

These two problems were fixed with this great widget by Alexander Blom, there’s a barcode to jump to the marketplace entry on his web page.

Wednesday, 9 June 2010

SideBySide Event 33 for msvsmon ia64

If you’re seeing an error in the event log that looks like this:

Activation context generation failed for "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0\Common7\IDE\Remote Debugger\ia64\msvsmon.exe". Dependent Assembly Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls,language="&#x2a;",processorArchitecture="ia64",publicKeyToken="6595b64144ccf1df",type="win32",version="6.0.0.0" could not be found. Please use sxstrace.exe for detailed diagnosis

And it’s occurring at about 00:30 every day, it seems to be caused by the scheduled task ProgramDataUpdater. It looks like it’s choking on the ia64 binary, and if you don’t need the Itanium version you could resolve it by renaming or deleting the exe, similar to this KB article:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2021839

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

.net 4 C# Parallel Array Bounds Checking

In previous versions of .net (x64 .net 2), as a result of experimenting with the profiler and forming beliefs (whether true or false :-) that:



  1. property accesses are expensive


  2. bounds checks are not eliminated for static member arrays (this one was correct, as Greg Young proves).


  3. parallel array accesses do not have the bounds checks optimized away


So, for consistency, I always wrote loops like this, with a local reference to the array and a variable in the loop scope holding the end limit.


int z = 0;


var localArray1 = memberArray1;


var localArray2 = memberArray2;


for (int x = 0, length = localArray1.Length; x < length; x++)


{


    z += localArray1[x] + localArray2[x];


}



Recently, I re-examined this practice with Visual Studio 2010 RC and the disassembly window. I wanted to find out what the best pattern would be consistency and allowing the JIT to hoist the bounds checks, eliminating them from the per-iteration part of the loop.



.net 2



x86 and x64 JITs were both unable to remove the bounds checks.



Rewriting the for loop to read




    for (int x = 0; x < localArray1.Length; x++)



Allowed the x86 JIT to eliminate one of the bounds checks. The x64 JIT still had both.



.net 4



The x86 JIT still had both bounds checks. The x64 JIT eliminated one.



Rewriting the for loop to read




    for (int x = 0; x < localArray1.Length; x++)



The x86 now had only one bounds check. The x64 eliminated both.



Conclusions




  • Don’t use a local variable to hold your array stopping condition.


  • Experiment with both ‘Any CPU’ and ‘x86’ if possible.


  • Check out the disassembly (step-by-step explanation by Vance Morrison).

Monday, 1 March 2010

Copying a Folder to and from Windows with rsync

Suppose you’ve got a NAS, or *nix box which has an rsync daemon running on it.

You’ve also got the convenient cwrsync bundle installed on your Windows box.

Now you want to be able to copy all the files in a folder on the windows box, say:

C:\foo\my spaced path\things

to and from the rsync module on your server.

To copy from the server to Windows

"c:\Program Files (x86)\cwRsync\bin\rsync.exe" -v -r -c rsync://@server/module /cygdrive/c/foo/"my spaced path"/things

This assumes the default installation path for cwrsync, you should drop the “ (x86)” if you’re not running on a 64-bit version of Windows.

The parameters include

  • -v for verbose
  • -c to always test file checksums rather than timestamps. If you’re happy that the timestamps are reliable, replace it with a –t to use (and copy) the timestamps.
  • -r for recursive.

The path on the Windows box has been munged to cygwin’s standards to look like a *nix path. 

  • The slashes all go forwards
  • The /cygdrive/c is the equivalent of “C:”
  • Any directory names that have spaces need a quote around their name, not around the path as a whole.

The path to the server specifies the rsync protocol, and the server name and module (like a share name in Windows/Samba/CIFS). I’ve not shown any user or password specification.

To copy from Windows to the server

"c:\Program Files (x86)\cwRsync\bin\rsync.exe" -v -c -r --no-perms --chmod=ugo=rwX /cygdrive/c/foo/"my spaced path"/things/ rsync://@server/module

Note the trailing slash after the Windows folder name. Without that, you’ll get a subfolder called “things” created under the module on your server.

I added the no-perms and chmod parameters because otherwise the ACLs that rsync placed on the copied files gave no rights to anyone.

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

MP3s Are Killing Home Taping

Just try giving a friend a C90 and asking them to copy a couple of albums for you.